Biology Open: evaluating impact

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Biology Open: evaluating impact

Biology Open: the story so far BiO is published by The Company of Biologists – a longestablished not-for-profit organisation with publishing at its heart. Our four sister journals – important community publications – should be well known to you: Development, Journal of Cell Science, Journal of Experimental Biology and Disease Models & Mechanisms (http://www.biologists.com/journals.html). The Co...

متن کامل

PLoS Biology—We're Open

W elcome to PLoS Biology. We would like to introduce you to your journal, one that is run by and for the scientific community in the broadest sense: researchers, teachers, students, physicians, and the public. One could argue whether scientists need more journals, but we believe there is a global need for greater access to scientific and medical information and that open-access journals can mee...

متن کامل

Introducing Open Biology

Since its creation the Royal Society has endeavoured to represent and support science in the broadest sense. Providing venues for scientists to publish their research is an integral part of this activity. The Society's established research journals Proceedings B and Biology Letters are very strong in ecology, evolution and behaviour and in overlapping areas. However, they publish very little " ...

متن کامل

Happy 5th Birthday Biology Open

The first issue of Biology Open (BiO) was published by The Company of Biologists, the long-established not-for-profit publishing organisation, in January 2012. The first article? An Editorial from our Editor-in-Chief outlining how BiO was going to reduce the pain to publish and make “life easier for us all” (Raff, 2012). In 2017, we celebrate five years of BiO (Fig. 1). So, six volumes, more th...

متن کامل

Evaluating Science's open-data policy.

Science must re-evaluate its open-data policy after retracting a controversial study on microplastics and fish in May (“Editorial Retraction,” J. Berg, 26 May, p. 812 and “Fishy business,” M. Enserink, News Feature, 24 March, p. 1254). The only computer containing the study’s raw data was allegedly stolen and no backups existed on another machine or an online repository. Many are left wondering...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Biology Open

سال: 2015

ISSN: 2046-6390

DOI: 10.1242/bio.016147